logo

Multiple CTAs in SFMC Emails: Which One Actually Works?

Multiple CTAs in SFMC Emails: Which One Actually Works?
author By CRMx
23 Jan 2026 8447 views

Salesforce Marketing Cloud emails rarely contain a single call to action. Modern templates typically include a mix of primary buttons, supporting text links, image links, navigation elements, and footer links. On paper, this feels helpful—more options for the subscriber.


In practice, multiple CTAs often create confusion.


Clicks still happen. CTR still looks acceptable. But conversions stall, primary goals are missed, and campaign managers are left wondering which CTA actually worked.


The problem isn’t the presence of multiple CTAs.
It’s the lack of visibility into how those CTAs compete.


Why Multiple CTAs Are So Common in SFMC Emails


Email teams include multiple CTAs for good reasons:




  • Different user intents




  • Supporting exploration before conversion




  • Stakeholder requests




  • Content density requirements




Over time, emails evolve to include:




  • A main CTA button




  • Secondary text links




  • Linked images




  • Logo or navigation links




  • Footer utility links




Salesforce Marketing Cloud supports all of this—but its reporting doesn’t explain how users choose between them.


The Big Question SFMC Reports Can’t Answer


After a send, campaign managers often ask:




  • Which CTA performed best?




  • Did the primary CTA actually win?




  • Did secondary links distract users?




  • Are we guiding behaviour or fragmenting it?




Salesforce Marketing Cloud reports show that clicks happened, not how attention was distributed.


All CTAs are merged into aggregated metrics, masking competition.


Why CTR Hides CTA Competition


CTR measures whether a user clicked any link.


That means:




  • A click on the main CTA




  • A click on a hero image




  • A click on a footer preference link




…all count the same.


As a result:




  • CTR can remain flat even when the wrong CTA is clicked




  • CTR can improve while conversion intent worsens




  • CTA performance problems stay invisible




Multiple CTAs don’t reduce CTR—they dilute intent.


How CTAs Compete Inside an Email


1. Visual Proximity Creates Choice Paralysis


When CTAs are placed too close together:




  • Users choose the easiest option




  • The most visually familiar element wins




  • The intended path loses priority




SFMC reports don’t show which choice users made—only that a choice occurred.


2. Images Often Outperform Buttons


Linked images frequently attract more clicks than buttons, especially when they appear first.


When images and buttons point to different destinations:




  • Attention splits




  • Conversion paths diverge




  • Performance becomes inconsistent




This behaviour is invisible in standard reports.


3. Text Links Feel Safer Than Buttons


Text links often feel less committal. Users click them to “learn more” rather than convert.


When placed near the primary CTA:




  • They siphon attention




  • They reduce button clicks




  • They inflate CTR without driving outcomes




SFMC doesn’t distinguish between exploratory and conversion clicks.


4. Utility Links Steal Silent Engagement


Footer links—preferences, privacy, unsubscribe—can quietly accumulate clicks.


These links:




  • Inflate CTR




  • Mask CTA underperformance




  • Create false confidence




Multiple CTAs exist, but not all of them matter equally.


Why Campaign Managers Guess Which CTA Worked


Without behavioural insight, teams rely on:




  • Design intent




  • Best practices




  • Past experience




  • Stakeholder opinions




Common assumptions include:




  • “The biggest button must be the winner”




  • “Users always click the hero CTA”




  • “Secondary links don’t matter much”




Sometimes these assumptions are correct. Often, they’re not.


Salesforce Marketing Cloud reporting can’t confirm or challenge them.


The Cost of CTA Guesswork


When teams don’t know which CTA worked, they:




  • Keep adding more options




  • Avoid removing underperforming links




  • Redesign entire layouts unnecessarily




  • Repeat the same CTA mistakes across campaigns




Over time, emails become cluttered—and performance plateaus.


How CRMx Reveals Which CTA Actually Works


This is where CRMx Email Heatmaps bring clarity to Salesforce Marketing Cloud emails.


CRMx adds behavioural insight that shows how users interact with each linked element—not just that they clicked.


Accurate by Design: Linked Elements Only


CRMx tracks clicks only on linked elements:




  • Linked buttons




  • Linked images




  • Linked text




Clicks on non-linked areas are not recorded.


This ensures:




  • Only intentional actions are analysed




  • No false engagement




  • Reliable CTA comparison




Link-Level Insight Instead of Aggregates


With CRMx, teams can analyse:




  • Clicks per CTA




  • Unique clicks per CTA




  • Relative performance across all CTAs




This immediately reveals:




  • Which CTA dominated attention




  • Which CTAs underperformed




  • Whether the primary CTA truly led engagement




For many teams, this insight is surprising.


CTA Ranking Ends Internal Debate


CRMx ranks CTAs by performance.


This answers critical questions instantly:




  • Which CTA came first?




  • Which one competed closely?




  • Which ones should be removed or repositioned?




Instead of debating opinions, teams work with evidence.


Understanding CTA Timing


Which CTA users click first matters as much as which one they click most.


CRMx surfaces timing insights that help teams understand:




  • Whether users click early CTAs and exit




  • Whether later CTAs are ever reached




  • How urgency influences CTA choice




Salesforce Marketing Cloud does not make this behaviour visible.


Designing With Intent, Not Hope


Once CTA behaviour is visible, optimisation becomes intentional:




  • Reduce competing CTAs




  • Align images and buttons to the same destination




  • Remove low-performing links




  • Strengthen hierarchy around the true winner




Instead of guessing, teams design around what users actually choose.


Why Multiple CTAs Fail Without Visibility


Multiple CTAs aren’t inherently bad. They fail when:




  • Teams don’t know which ones work




  • Attention is fragmented




  • Conversion intent is diluted




Salesforce Marketing Cloud reports can’t diagnose this problem.


CRMx can.


Final Thoughts: Multiple CTAs Need Clear Winners


When every CTA looks important, none of them truly are.


Salesforce Marketing Cloud reporting shows outcomes, not competition. CRMx exposes how CTAs compete—and which one actually wins.


When teams understand CTA behaviour:




  • Emails become simpler




  • Conversions become clearer




  • Optimisation becomes faster




  • Results become repeatable






Want to Know Which CTA Really Wins in Your Emails?


If you want to see which CTAs attract attention, which ones distract users, and how to simplify your emails for better results, it’s time to go beyond standard SFMC reports.


👉 Request a CRMx Email Heatmap demo and identify the CTA that actually works.

Share this post:

Related Blogs

See how modern email heatmaps uncover real engagement and help marketers boost clicks in 2025

See how modern email heatmaps uncover real engagement and help marketers boost clicks in 2025

In the evolving landscape of digital marketing, understanding how your audience interacts with your email content is cru...

23 Jul 2025
Top 5 Email Heatmap Metrics to Boost Your Campaign Performance

Top 5 Email Heatmap Metrics to Boost Your Campaign Performance

In 2025, high-performing marketers don’t just rely on open rates and CTR—they unlock real insights with e...

23 Jul 2025
Email Heatmaps vs Traditional Reports: What You’re Missing Out On

Email Heatmaps vs Traditional Reports: What You’re Missing Out On

In the fast-paced world of email marketing, data is everything. But not all data tells the full story. While traditional...

30 Jul 2025